Project Description



Photo Mail focuses on
Contemporary photography
Practitioners, their works, and
Its aesthetics
In the broader context of
Photographic theory and

Bandeep singh
Pandemic lockdown walk by Migrant Workers © Bandeep Singh | Source Internet

The Long Walk to Home

A critical reading of Bandeep Singh’s photographs

During the corona pandemic lockdown, India saw its migrant workers walk in an ardent will to reach the safety of their homes… History repeats itself, they say. Well, not exactly the same situation, but during Indian’s partition, thousands of Muslims and Hindus had to cross over – in search of a new home in unknown terrain. Seen through the photographic eyes of Margaret Bourke-White and Sunil Janah – the horrifying events of Indian Partition 1947 comes alive – once again in the Corona days – much more violent, cruel, and gruesome. It is a stark reminder that even after 70 and odd years of independence, India still has not healed itself of poverty, inequality, and oppression.

There have been several photographs of the unfortunate long walk made by India’s poorest among poor – the migrant workers who cut across different castes and religions. The most popular and gruesome was made by photographer Bandeep Singh for India Today. His sensational, horrifying, unforgivable, high definition graphic images of the migrant workers in their moment of distress has indeed caused a stir. But then, the one who has taken the photograph and the ones who had seen the photographs, by now would have forgotten the event or have buried it underneath, convincing themselves that there is nothing much that can be done. Well, for what it is worth, these photographs of agony did make some to think and a few to act. There is nothing to be said about those who had brushed aside the suffering of the migrant workers as mere collateral damage. However, even those who had been affected by it had to get on with their life. Increasing exposure to images of violence rather numbs one’s feelings and sensitivity, and these disjoint moments of violence cannot be prolonged by the ones who are not directly experiencing it.

While we continue to hear information about the difficulties of the migrant workers – nothing much has changed, sociologically or politically. In the second phase of lockdown, another wave of workers were stranded in the bus-stations – struggling in Bangalore. More are scattered in many parts of Indian central vista. So what was the effect of such graphical depictions? It is the hard truth that some of these workers have died on their way back. Some have reached their respective homes with sore legs and other illness. Some have been locked in make-shift shelters – reduced to living in sub-human standards and lifestyles. Those who managed to reach their homes are probably finding it hard to meet ends. Some may have received government aid. Some may have contracted the virus and suffering alone in impoverished hospitals. Life goes on for them – one struggle after another. So, while the life of the back-at-their-homes-but-still-displaced workers continues on the brink, the viewers for whose sake the images were produced, continue with their everyday life.

However, the photographs have a different lifetime and timeline. In the future, Bandeep’s photographs would be hailed as a historical document. What not, they will surely find its way into museums or press photo awards. As the former photo-editor of India Today and who is presently with Fortune India, he has such a reputation and reach. When not shooting agonies, Bandeep Singh doubles as a fashion and fine art photographer. He achieves a fine balance between passion and impassion – be it a popular corporate persona in their moments of glory or a person in distress – as per the demands of his clients/company he is attuned to produce sensational content. He adds his photographs with eloquent words, which means additional emotional content when it comes to editorial/social documentary works. Bandeep closely follows the style of Sebastião Salgado, a famous Brazilian social documentary photographer, and photojournalist whose works were praised for its graphical content and sociological concern. Bandeep repeatedly attests his knowledge about the questions surrounding the ethics of photographing people in distress – shares his dilemmas and his eventual submission to doing his duty. Inadvertently, he places himself as a victim – a helpless single man witnessing an unfolding dramatic situation. As if it is a realistically unfolding “unreal” tragic performance, the photographer silently watches and shoots – for the highest good of informing the mass, the so-called uninformed that needs graphic content to be woken up to the realities of life.

Of course, one cannot totally negate the arguments put forth by the defenders of photographs of agony. As chroniclers of history, the role of a photographer is also to record all possible significant events around the world. They say that the power of traditional media is immense, and that entrusts the photojournalists with the ability to influence public opinion. The depiction of the pain of others is believed to raise society’s awareness and encourage them to act against senseless violence. If photographs do not inform the world of the unfavorable events, then it would be akin to putting the rest of the world in a bubble – blind to what is really happening.
Agreed. Partially at least. But, as claimed, do photographs of agony give voice to the people in distress? And, what is the role of the subject? Most often than not, the people who are photographed do not have any choice over being photographed, how they are being photographed, and how it is being circulated. In the case of extreme contexts of agony, they may not even be aware of being photographed, as they are lost in their own world of pain. Bandeep’s quote accompanying one of his photographs better summarizes this, “…on the road is this young kid – more middle class in appearance – resting on his backpack… his younger sisters sitting on the edge of the pavement… As I bend to take his picture, his body reflexes to get up …but is pinned down by fatigue .. he averts his gaze from the camera – as if to blank me out .”

So, what gives one the right to photograph people in their moment of powerlessness? In this case, the information that thousands of Indians are forcefully displaced is news in itself that warns people of the disaster in progress, then what is the need for such a graphical depiction of people in suffering? Does an altruistic sociological concern permit one to graphically document people in agony? Robbing one’s right to appropriate representation is indeed a violation of the fundamental rights of the individual. It is exploitation, and as long as this exploitation is allowed and accepted – people will continue to be made voiceless. Such repeated representations invariably dehumanize the people and reduce them to be merely a means to an end. Let’s not be fooled by appearances and ignore the flawed system that this points to – firstly, at the level of the photographer, secondly the publisher/curator/exhibitor/archivist, thirdly the viewer, and fourthly the social structures that allow such representations.

It is often claimed that the photographer has the power over deciding which event, person, or place is worth photographing. The fact is, it is most often influenced by those in power and those who have access to power. In this case, India Today is the decisive factor. Mind grabbing visuals increase the chances of its magazines getting sold. More sales means more profit. So, invariably, the photographer serves the agenda of the agency they work for. Also, one should not overlook the possibilities for recognition such as the World Press Photo Award, etc., that are reserved for such adventurous images, shot in the most difficult of circumstances. Besides, most of the opportunities in the world of photography are for photo-journalism. Even museums and galleries frame the agonies and sell them.

This also points to the particular set of viewers, who either need such gruesome pictures for waking up to reality or secretly enjoys visuals of violence. Even after so much exposure to intense visuals of people in distress – if we need more images of sad moments to understand the harsh realities of social inequalities – then as a society we are failing somewhere. As viewers and consumers of photographs of agony, aren’t we bordering on sadism? For the photo-journalists, it is just a week’s story and a photo opportunity. For the viewers, it was a piece of news to indulge, respond/act/ignore, and then forget. But for the people, their private pain has become a public affair – and worse, nothing much actually gets done.

In Bandeep’s photographs, the very workers– who had dared ‘to work their way against the tide’ become reduced to helpless victims. The ones who are facing the atrocities of the brutal class/caste division, become a tool to brush the egos of the privileged few, who could look at with the same impassion that allowed one to press the click button of the camera while witnessing agony. The top-down, privileged, I-am-here-to-inform-the-world attitude doesn’t legitimate such documentation of people. Today, social media is more active, fast, and informed than traditional media structures. In this updated world, it is high time that the ‘world of photo-journalism’ revisits their ethics and expression. Sooner or later everyone would become a chronicler of their own life. In that age of self-expression, people in agony/distress would have found their voice and representation.

But for now, no argument can deny that photographs of agony promote the culture of silence. Why wasn’t there any resistance from the side of workers? Why haven’t directives been implemented in the protection of the tenants? Why did they silently accept all misfortunes as fate? The same migrant workers had organized a protest in Kerala – they wanted Chappathis instead of rice. They had found their voice in their home away from home. But in their very homes, their voices are numbed – politically, sociologically – and sadly, nowadays, visually. No matter what the justifications are, these cruel photographs will be a living witness to the human madness which consumed the profound sadness and abandonment of the piercing eyes that saw Bandeep’s car pass by with a weapon at hand – the camera.

Tulsi Swarna Lakshmi

Tulsi Swarna Lakshmi is an independent writer and film-maker. She has more than a decade of experience working with leading National and International Non-Government Organisations in India, Africa, and South America. She is the Founder Managing Trustee of Ekalokam Trust for Photography and the Executive Editor of PhotoMail.

Published on November  22, 2020


Home » Portfolio » Focus » The Long Walk to Home: A Critical Reading

Related Articles


Dilli Chalo: Ready for the long haul

As part of the ‘Dilli Chalo’ protest called on November 26 and 27, lakhs of farmers, laborers, and small traders decided to march from Punjab, Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and other states towards Delhi. During their attempt to reach Delhi, the farmers faced warlike resistance from the Indian government at two inter-state borders. Protesters occupied several miles of highway with their tractors and trolleys.


The Long Walk to Home: A Critical Reading

During the corona pandemic lockdown, India saw its migrant workers walk in an ardent will to reach the safety of their homes… History repeats itself, they say. Well, not exactly the same situation, but during Indian’s partition, thousands of Muslims and Hindus had to cross over – in search of a new home in unknown terrain. Seen through the photographic eyes of Margaret Bourke-White and Sunil Janah – the horrifying events of Indian Partition 1947 comes alive – once again in the Corona days – much more violent, cruel, and gruesome. It is a stark reminder that even after 70 and odd years of independence, India still has not healed itself of poverty, inequality, and oppression.


Perspectives on Photography

What we normally forget is that the lens of a camera sees more than the normal human eye is capable of. The clarity and the depth in a photographic image are taken for granted as we considered the camera as an extension of our eyes though what it sees is an abstracted or unperceivable image for the naked human eye. Seeing more or seeing in detail foregrounds the notion of abstraction because the form captured by the camera is only partially visible and its comprehension, in the normal course of our ways of seeing, is difficult.


Indian Photography’s (Conceptual) Poverty and Reality

Alessio Mamo’s series of photographs titled ‘Dreaming Food’ was shot in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh in 2011, in which he tried to illustrate the contrast in the manner food was wasted in the West “especially at Christmas time”, and the widespread poverty that he saw in parts of India. The series was exhibited in Delhi Photography Festival in 2013, but when he posted images from the series during his takeover of World Press Photo’s Instagram handle as one of its awardees of 2018, a public debate erupted around the nature of his work and its political correctness. WPP has since issued a statement in which it clarifies the guidelines for its Instagram takeover, which is a benefit given to its award winners. But Indian print and online media subsequently took up the issue and it has been given wide coverage, with experts, photographers, and commentators weighing in from all sides. Now that all the arguments for and against have been brought out, PhotoMail takes a look at this issue in the broader context of poverty representation in India.


Power, Democracy and ‘Other’ Women

Photography, after the Second World War and McCarthyism, was consciously pushed into the sanitised spaces of Art galleries and Museums away from its past as a concerned, conscience-pricking tool. We were told by institutional gatekeepers like the Museum of Modern Art in New York that Photography was only about Itself. It was an Art form that was about navel-gazing photographers and about flattened formalist fields. Photography was not supposed to exist outside its own frame.


Metamorphosis by Shanthi Kasi

Walls have been featured as subjects, or at least as integral parts of broader subjects, by many artists across various media, owing to its metaphorical significance, its role as a visual and spatial block, and also what its surface holds. Shanthi Kashi’s concern is the surface of these walls, on which the artist observes patterns, forms, and colours and composes them to achieve – not necessarily literal – meaning. Shot in Mumbai and Bangalore, Shanthi also merges an abstract language with some very real phenomena related to the individual, geography and society through the presence of moisture, decay, erasure and abandonment.