Light painting in photography, a technique that traces the effect of time on objects (in motion) through long exposures, shrinking the events across a period into one frame, is not a new idea. It dates back to the late 1880s with Étienne-Jules Marey and Georges Demeny tracing human motion in their famous work called Pathological Walk From in Front. A few years before this, English photographer Eadweard Muybridge had made interesting still sequence of animals in motion, paving the way for photographing objects in motion with precision. Berenice Abbot’s photographic studies of light and motion done during the beginning of the 20th century, contributed much towards the understanding of physical laws and properties of solids and liquids. The long exposure images were shot using strobe lights flashing on an object as it moves through space and time. It was Man Ray who first used the technique in its contemporary sense, as light “painting”, in photographs for the series titled Space Walking, 1935. A few other photographers including American photographer Barbara Morgan had used the technique and in 1949, Pablo Picasso followed suit by making a series of works titled Light Drawings, the most famous one being Picasso draws a Centaur. With the arrival of digital technology and electronics, it became a lot easier to draw using light and many artists in the developed nations had used it innovatively. In March 2007, Jan Leonardo, a German photographer coined the term light art performance photography (LAPP) emphasising the performative aspect of this technique. This term particularly refers to photographs in which abandoned structures, buildings and natural landscape are included in the background. Flashlights, light pen, candles, matches, fireworks, lighter flints, glowsticks and poi are popular sources of light used in such works.
Indian photography hasn’t seen many such explorations that interact and intersect with other media such as light art. But this has started to change in the last couple of years, with a few photographers trying to do light painting; and it is in this context that Joyel K Pious and Gaurav Rachamalla’s collaborative photo project becomes striking. Although this style is popular in the west, this collaborative project stands tall and distinctive amidst the usual Indian street and documentary photographs. It probes the philosophical underpinnings that are intrinsic to the medium itself as well as pose several questions related to urbanisation.
Hunting for places in Hyderabad that at least until now hasn’t surrendered to the relentless urban invasion, the two collaborators seek and identify desolated places and abandoned structures in and around the city’s iconographical buildings such as Maula Ali Dargah, Attarah Seedi near Golconda Fort, Pahadi Shareef Dargah, and the wild outdoors of Osmania University. Archaeologically proven to have been inhabited since the Indian Iron Age that started in 1000 BCE, the region comprising modern Hyderabad and its surroundings were known as Golkonda, literally meaning shepherd’s hill. The modern city of Hyderabad was founded by Muhammad Quli Qutb Shah, the fifth sultan of the Qutb Shahi dynasty of Golkonda in the year 1591. Within a century, the region was captured by the Mughals and the Nizam’s dominions became a princely state during the British Raj. Hyderabad became a center for artists in the mid-19th century with the decline of the Mughal Empire and emerged as one of the important centres of culture in India. Today, it is the sixth most populous urban agglomeration in India, resulting in the erasing of city’s sketchy wilderness. The landmark architectural marvels built during Qutb Shahi and Nizam rule stands in contrast to the burgeoning sky scrapers, diligently preserving memories from a distant past.
Interestingly, the meeting point between Joyel and Gaurav is their own individual interests – Photography and Architecture respectively. The medium of photography offers this possibility of collaboration between different streams, and the point that it is today a dominant form of communication is irrefutable. Most importantly, the changing interaction between architecture and photography, bending in favor of the latter is worth a look. Initially, especially during the colonial documentation, photography was only a technique that documents buildings. It meant that, the role of photography was subservient to that of architecture, which had a greater political, social and artistic value. From being just a means to an end, photography has become a standalone art form with its own aesthetics and expressions, while still being the medium that is most open to interactions with the outside world. Possibly because of the delayed recognition, or the fact that it is now an easy one click application that doesn’t require much effort, most photographers do not consider collaborating with other artists. This is more so in the Indian context, where, by default, stalking the streets all by oneself is preferred to thoughtful creations.
Architecture in photographs have a far greater meaning nowadays. Its position, prominence, focus etc., conveys different connotations and is part of the photographic statement as such. In Joyel and Gaurav’s work, the iconic buildings are the main crux of the narrative, but not so in a direct manner. They do not occupy the central space in the frame, and oftentimes they are excluded, but the vantage points are recognizable to anyone who has truly explored these legendary structures. In the images, the invisible and distant symbols of timeless past pulsate in the background, while the vast sea of lights that represents contemporary buildings is being looked at by a lone figure. Though filling up the larger part of the frame, somehow these buildings become reduced, and even become irrelevant compared to the story that is being narrated, a story of those who belong to the edges, the off beats and the once upon a time shepherds and indigenous people, who lived and loved in nature. Indirectly, it stalks the ever growing population, and their preoccupation for being oblivious to what has been lost and what is at the verge of being lost forever. The humans in the photographs, the one within the frame and the one who is shooting, seem to be the only ones here who are aware of both the existences, of the ironies of development.
Interestingly titled A Sense of Dislocation, these works have indeed sprung from this deepening sense of dislocation that succeeds in creeping on to the viewer as well – the seamless balance of dazzling movement constructed on purpose in the backdrop of artificiality pops up against the uncanny darkness and effervescent light. The light, artificial and otherwise, in the forefront, becomes the connecting dot for the medium itself, which records electromagnetic radiations of all sorts. On top of being juxtaposed between two extreme realities – one that is a habitation and the other an almost empty space, here, the light becomes a tool to provide a three dimensional appearance, surpassing the limitations of the medium that offers plain and simple two dimensional experience of a multi-dimensional reality. The long exposure, necessitated by the dark ambience, shows what was and what is, bridging the time gap through murky reflections of a presence in its absence, meandering one about the trails left behind.